JWT vs Session-Based Authentication: Which Should You Use?
JWT vs Session Authentication
Choosing between JWT and session-based authentication depends on your application's requirements. Let's compare both approaches.
Session-Based Authentication
How It Works
Advantages
- Easy revocation: Simply delete the session
- Server control: Full control over active sessions
- Smaller payload: Only session ID transmitted
- Proven security: Well-understood security model
Disadvantages
- Stateful: Requires server-side storage
- Scaling challenges: Session sharing across servers
- CSRF vulnerability: Cookie-based sessions need CSRF protection
JWT Authentication
How It Works
Advantages
- Stateless: No server-side storage needed
- Scalability: Works across multiple servers
- Cross-domain: Works across different domains
- Mobile-friendly: Easy to use in mobile apps
Disadvantages
- No instant revocation: Tokens valid until expiration
- Larger payload: Entire token transmitted each time
- Token storage security: XSS risks with localStorage
When to Use Each
Choose Sessions When:
- You need instant logout/revocation
- You have a single-domain application
- You prefer simpler security model
- Server resources aren't a concern
Choose JWT When:
- Building microservices architecture
- Need cross-domain authentication
- Building mobile applications
- Implementing single sign-on (SSO)
- Scaling across multiple servers
Hybrid Approach
Many applications use both:
- Short-lived JWTs for API authentication
- Refresh tokens stored as sessions
- Best of both worlds: stateless requests with revocation capability
Conclusion
There's no one-size-fits-all answer. Consider your application's architecture, scale requirements, and security needs when making your decision.